AI-generated Key Takeaways
-
AbstractChronologyis a foundational class for implementing various calendar systems, withIsoChronologyas its primary subclass, representing the ISO calendar. -
This class provides a framework for comparing chronologies and managing their equality, utilizing both ID-based and state-based comparisons via the
compareTo,equals, andhashCodemethods. -
The
resolveDatemethod withinAbstractChronologyis crucial for translating temporal field values, like year, month, and day, into a concrete date, with customizable validation rules for date fields being applied. -
AbstractChronologyhandles the combination of various temporal fields to form a date, including the management of fields likeYEAR,ALIGNED_WEEK_OF_YEAR, andDAY_OF_WEEK, with the resolution style impacting the validation and adjustment of these values. -
The toString() method will output the chronology as a string, relying on the chronology ID to do so.
| Known Direct Subclasses |
An abstract implementation of a calendar system, used to organize and identify dates.
The main date and time API is built on the ISO calendar system. The chronology operates behind the scenes to represent the general concept of a calendar system.
See Chronology for more details.
Protected Constructor Summary
|
AbstractChronology()
Creates an instance.
|
Public Method Summary
| int | |
| boolean | |
| int |
hashCode()
A hash code for this chronology.
|
| ChronoLocalDate |
resolveDate(Map<TemporalField, Long> fieldValues, ResolverStyle resolverStyle)
Resolves parsed
ChronoField values into a date during parsing. |
| String |
toString()
Outputs this chronology as a
String, using the chronology ID. |
Inherited Method Summary
Protected Constructors
protected AbstractChronology ()
Creates an instance.
Public Methods
public int compareTo (Chronology other)
Compares this chronology to another chronology.
The comparison order first by the chronology ID string, then by any
additional information specific to the subclass.
It is "consistent with equals", as defined by Comparable.
Parameters
| other | the other chronology to compare to, not null |
|---|
Returns
- the comparator value, negative if less, positive if greater
public boolean equals (Object obj)
Checks if this chronology is equal to another chronology.
The comparison is based on the entire state of the object.
Parameters
| obj | the object to check, null returns false |
|---|
Returns
- true if this is equal to the other chronology
public int hashCode ()
A hash code for this chronology.
The hash code should be based on the entire state of the object.
Returns
- a suitable hash code
public ChronoLocalDate resolveDate (Map<TemporalField, Long> fieldValues, ResolverStyle resolverStyle)
Resolves parsed ChronoField values into a date during parsing.
Most TemporalField implementations are resolved using the
resolve method on the field. By contrast, the ChronoField class
defines fields that only have meaning relative to the chronology.
As such, ChronoField date fields are resolved here in the
context of a specific chronology.
ChronoField instances are resolved by this method, which may
be overridden in subclasses.
EPOCH_DAY- If present, this is converted to a date and all other date fields are then cross-checked against the date.PROLEPTIC_MONTH- If present, then it is split into theYEARandMONTH_OF_YEAR. If the mode is strict or smart then the field is validated.YEAR_OF_ERAandERA- If both are present, then they are combined to form aYEAR. In lenient mode, theYEAR_OF_ERArange is not validated, in smart and strict mode it is. TheERAis validated for range in all three modes. If only theYEAR_OF_ERAis present, and the mode is smart or lenient, then the last available era is assumed. In strict mode, no era is assumed and theYEAR_OF_ERAis left untouched. If only theERAis present, then it is left untouched.YEAR,MONTH_OF_YEARandDAY_OF_MONTH- If all three are present, then they are combined to form a date. In all three modes, theYEARis validated. If the mode is smart or strict, then the month and day are validated. If the mode is lenient, then the date is combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the first month in the requested year, then adding the difference in months, then the difference in days. If the mode is smart, and the day-of-month is greater than the maximum for the year-month, then the day-of-month is adjusted to the last day-of-month. If the mode is strict, then the three fields must form a valid date.YEARandDAY_OF_YEAR- If both are present, then they are combined to form a date. In all three modes, theYEARis validated. If the mode is lenient, then the date is combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the requested year, then adding the difference in days. If the mode is smart or strict, then the two fields must form a valid date.YEAR,MONTH_OF_YEAR,ALIGNED_WEEK_OF_MONTHandALIGNED_DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_MONTH- If all four are present, then they are combined to form a date. In all three modes, theYEARis validated. If the mode is lenient, then the date is combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the first month in the requested year, then adding the difference in months, then the difference in weeks, then in days. If the mode is smart or strict, then the all four fields are validated to their outer ranges. The date is then combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the requested year and month, then adding the amount in weeks and days to reach their values. If the mode is strict, the date is additionally validated to check that the day and week adjustment did not change the month.YEAR,MONTH_OF_YEAR,ALIGNED_WEEK_OF_MONTHandDAY_OF_WEEK- If all four are present, then they are combined to form a date. The approach is the same as described above for years, months and weeks inALIGNED_DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_MONTH. The day-of-week is adjusted as the next or same matching day-of-week once the years, months and weeks have been handled.YEAR,ALIGNED_WEEK_OF_YEARandALIGNED_DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_YEAR- If all three are present, then they are combined to form a date. In all three modes, theYEARis validated. If the mode is lenient, then the date is combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the requested year, then adding the difference in weeks, then in days. If the mode is smart or strict, then the all three fields are validated to their outer ranges. The date is then combined in a manner equivalent to creating a date on the first day of the requested year, then adding the amount in weeks and days to reach their values. If the mode is strict, the date is additionally validated to check that the day and week adjustment did not change the year.YEAR,ALIGNED_WEEK_OF_YEARandDAY_OF_WEEK- If all three are present, then they are combined to form a date. The approach is the same as described above for years and weeks inALIGNED_DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_YEAR. The day-of-week is adjusted as the next or same matching day-of-week once the years and weeks have been handled.
The default implementation is suitable for most calendar systems.
If ChronoField.YEAR_OF_ERA is found without an ChronoField.ERA
then the last era in Chronology.eras() is used.
The implementation assumes a 7 day week, that the first day-of-month
has the value 1, that first day-of-year has the value 1, and that the
first of the month and year always exists.
Parameters
| fieldValues | the map of fields to values, which can be updated, not null |
|---|---|
| resolverStyle | the requested type of resolve, not null |
Returns
- the resolved date, null if insufficient information to create a date
Throws
| DateTimeException | if the date cannot be resolved, typically because of a conflict in the input data |
|---|
public String toString ()
Outputs this chronology as a String, using the chronology ID.
Returns
- a string representation of this chronology, not null