Discourse markers

When we communicate, we mark how upcoming words or phrases relate to previous discourse (i.e., spoken or written language used in a social context). These discourse markers ease comprehension by providing a preview of what’s coming up next; they are essential for making a conversation sound natural and fluid, as opposed to robotic and stilted.

Discourse markers connect utterances by succinctly and explicitly relating what has just been said to what is about to be said through notions such as:

addition above all, also, along with, and, as well as, additionally, besides, further, furthermore, in addition, last but not least, moreover, not only… but also, too, what’s more
assessment amazingly, astonishingly, hopefully, ideally, importantly, incredibly, inevitably, ironically, justifiably, oddly, predictably, refreshingly, regrettably, sadly, strikingly, surprisingly, (un)fortunately, (un)reasonably, (un)remarkably
comparison also, equally, in comparison, in the same way, like, likewise, similarly, too
concession admittedly, after all, all the same, anyhow, anyway, at any rate, besides, in any case, in any event, nevertheless, still, though, yet
contrast although, but, by comparison, conversely, however, on the contrary, on the other hand, unlike
disclaimer be advised, FYI, for your information, (just) so you know, (just) so you’re aware,
example as an example, as an illustration, e.g., for example, for instance
inferential in that case, otherwise, then
purpose because of this, for that reason, so that, to this end
reformulation i.e., in other words, in plain English, namely, specifically, strictly speaking, that is, that is to say
replacement alternately, in lieu of, in place of, instead, on second thought, or, rather
result as a result, consequently, for some reason or other, somehow, then, therefore, thus, since, so
sequential order Ordinal enumeration: first, second, third… Cardinal enumeration: one, two, three… Alphabetical enumeration: a, b, c… Sequential relations: for starters, to begin with, next, then, finally, last, lastly, to conclude...
summary all in all, in brief, in closing, in conclusion, in general, in short, in sum, in summary, to conclude, to sum up, to summarize, on the whole
time after a while, after that, afterward, at the same time, in the meantime, later, meanwhile, previously, simultaneously, subsequently
topic changers as an aside, by the way, incidentally, in passing, (just) to update you, now, on a different note, parenthetically, speaking of which, while we’re on the subject
uncertainty arguably, conceivably, indeed, evidently, likely, perhaps, possibly, presumably, seemingly, supposedly
veracity absolutely, actually, as a matter of fact, assuredly, certainly, decidedly, definitely, doubtless, genuinely, in actuality, in reality, in truth, incontestably, incontrovertibly, indisputably, indubitably, literally, obviously, officially, really, strictly speaking, surely, to be sure, undeniably, undoubtedly, without a doubt

Use these criteria to easily identify discourse markers. They’re often confused with acknowledgements and/or implicit confirmations. However, each component has a different purpose in the dialog, which is why they’re sometimes combined in a single prompt.

Discourse markers can't stand on their own.

"By the way" and "For example" can’t stand on their own—they require additional content.

Removing a discourse marker does not change the truthfulness of the sentence.

Discourse markers do not modify the truth condition of the utterance. Instead, they situate it relative to the greater context. Removing “Actually” from “Actually, your music app needs to be set up first” does not change its meaning. Here, “Actually” mitigates the user’s expectations since we can’t do what they’ve asked. This discourse marker provides the necessary transition from the user’s request to the reason why we can’t fulfill it.

Note that acknowledgments (e.g., “Sorry”, “Okay”, “Sure”, “Alright”, “Great”) are not discourse markers because (1) they can stand by themselves, and (2) they don’t provide insight into how the meaning of what follows relates to what came before.

Use discourse markers like “and” or “also” to show how an utterance adds to the previous one. Use discourse markers like “now” to change topics.


It’s clear that there are 3 ways to watch (livestream, YouTube recordings, extended viewing party). It’s also clear when the topic changes from answering the question to offering to answer another.


Here, the relationship between the sentences is not clear, and the prompt sounds stilted without discourse markers.

Use discourse markers like “so” to show how one utterance is the result of another.


“So” helps clarify cause-and-effect relationships.


Without “so”, the conversation sounds robotic and impersonal. Users also have to work harder to connect the dots.


“So” is a turn-taking transition. Here, the result is that now the user has to choose a payment method.

Use discourse markers like “by the way” to introduce additional, often tangential information that’s highly relevant.


“By the way” transitions from the answer to the additional information provided. In this example, the additional information is relevant and useful to the user.


The last sentence feels abrupt and unrelated without the discourse marker to shift the topic. The tangent is more likely to confuse the user and catch them off guard.

Use enumeration to separate items on a list, making it clear where one item ends and another begins.


Start with an overview and enumerate the items on the list, especially if they’re user-generated text strings.


When information is unstructured, it’s easy for the listener to get lost and feel overwhelmed.

Use “otherwise” to introduce contrary circumstances that add to or refine the preceding statement.


Only use “otherwise” when the information that follows is informative, not obvious.


Avoid “otherwise” for predictable, binary choices. A better prompt would be “Sorry, did I get that right?”